The AUSTIN-RIGGS Questions

RIGGS QUESTIONS

(John Clinard, July 20, 2017)

We know that the Austin Family of Greeneville TN, which includes my wife, has a Y-DNA signature which matches that of the Edward Riggs Family. Several Y-DNA tests were conducted using various male Austin cousins of my wife in order to study this unexpected finding.

What is our current thinking? This chart represents our current thinking. Clyde Austin, III who matches the Edwardian Riggs Modal, descends as indicated from Edward Riggs (b. 1720) through his son Archibald. Wealthy Pruett was the mother of Archibald.





1     1. Was ARCHIBALD P. Austin a Riggs at all?

We know ARCH was a son of Wealthy Pruett (or Prewitt or Pruitt) and some man. This man (let’s call him ARCH-FATHER) was in Pittsylvania Co. VA in 1766, whether living there or just passing through. It’s pretty clear that we have proven nothing about ARCH-FATHER; and nothing about his DNA is certain.  Because we think Wealthy was having sex with Joseph Austin (b. 1730 & of the E1b1a Austin line), it is possible that ARCH-FATHER was Joseph. Because we have been studying the Riggs family and because those Austin men alive today match the Riggs Y-DNA of Edward Riggs (b. 1593 in ENGLAND) we have formed a primary theory that ARCH-FATHER was Capt. Edward Riggs. Alvy has shown Capt. Edward’s line to be as follows:
Though we remain committed to the idea of ARCH-FATHER’s being this Edward Riggs, there remains a chance that ARCH-FATHER was neither Joseph Austin nor Edward Riggs, but rather just another unknown fellow with whom Wealthy had casual sex in 1766.

(Details for Joseph Austin: http://www.afaoa.org/db_files/Thomas_Austin_VA/Individuals/I557.html)

We know for certain that ARCH took the name Austin after Joseph Austin married Wealthy Pruett in 1777 when ARCH was 10 years old. We also know that ARCH brought his Austin family (wife, 2 daughters & 1 son) to E. TN in ~1797, just after statehood for TN. ARCH & wife (Rebecca Blankenship) had about 7 more children born in E. TN. One of these is thought to be Clisbe Austin, Sr. (b. 1802). All the Y-DNA collected thus far proves that this Clisbe, Sr. is the MRCA of William Luther Austin, Robert Carter Austin, Jr. & Clyde Bernard Austin, III. Yes, it has been PROVEN that Clisbe, Sr. was a Riggs man.  But we have proven nothing about Clisbe’s father, have we? (For that matter, we have proven nothing about Clisbe’s mother, either.) Was his father ARCH Austin, or was his father somebody else?  Either way, that man (let’s call him CLISBE-FATHER) carried the Riggs Y-DNA from progenitor Edward Riggs (b. 1593).




2      \2. Why would Alvy Ray Smith question the Y-DNA of ARCH Austin?

Firstly, we have not found a distant-enough Austin cousin sharing Riggs Y-DNA to prove a MRCA of ARCH (i.e., to prove ARCH was a Riggs). God knows we have tried. Our hope was John Ellison Austin, a 4th cousin of Robert & Clyde Austin. John Ellison and Robert or Clyde have a MRCA of ARCH Austin, according to reliable paper studies. Unfortunately, John Ellison Austin did not carry Riggs Y-DNA; instead he carried Stultz Y-DNA. Yet another NPE upstream of John Ellison Austin; we have not had the energy to figure this NPE out yet.

Alvy’s shorter answer is that all 3 Austin-Riggs matches carry 2 mutations from the Edwardian Riggs Modal. They each carry a “38 (L)” at marker 34, and they carry a “9 (i)” at marker 47. The Edwardian modal puts a “37 (K)” at M34 and a “10 (j)” at M47. This bothers Alvy in the absence of a better proof using the MRCA paper-study & Y-DNA triangulation approach.  If we look at Alvy’s “private” Y-DNA study what do we find at M34 and M47?


In Alvy’s table it is easy to see the matching three Austin-Riggs men with their mutations at M34 & M47. Above we have included Wesley Brandon Riggs who likewise shares “L” at M34, but not “i” at M47.  Here is what Alvy adds for Wesley:




 We see that Wesley has been proven a descendant of Clisbe Riggs and Clisbe’s father Capt. Edward Riggs. This is highly significant. If we assume that Wesley Brandon Riggs is a true distant cousin (1/2- 5th cousin twice removed) of Robert & Clyde Austin, then we could easily explain-away the mutation at M47 for the 3 Austin-Riggs men. Their MRCA is Clisbe Austin, Sr. who could have produced the mutation at M47. If ARCH was a son of Edward Riggs & Wealthy Pruett, ARCH would be a ½ brother of Clisbe Riggs. While ARCH mutated at M47, Clisbe did not mutate from the Modal. This allowed the “j” at M47 to continue moving forward in time for Clisbe Rigg’s descendants, all the way down 7 more generations to Wesley Brandon Riggs. It’s a possible answer. But not a proof just yet that ARCH was a Riggs.



3   3. Why would Alvy Ray Smith request a dis-proof concerning Clisbe Rigg’s being the father of Clisbe Austin, Sr.?  In Alvy’s words…



Firstly, we think it is interesting that Alvy would put forth this request when it “indicates” a belief/possibility that Clisbe Austin, Sr. descended from Edward Riggs through Edward’s son, Clisbe Riggs. But it remains a very good question.  Yet we suspect that Alvy suspects there is significant credence for Edward Rigg’s being the progenitor of the Austin-Riggs men of TN & TX.

Here is the best answer we have for Alvy’s question. Timing does not work to prove or to dis-prove his question. Clisbe Austin, Sr. was born in early 1802 in E. TN. So, the father of Clisbe Austin could have been Clisbe Riggs who, at age 36 in 1801, was living in E.TN with his wife Jane Evans as well as producing a daughter with Jane named Phebe Riggs in 1802. Just as true, ARCH Austin, at age 34 in 1801, was in the same-as-Clisbe-Riggs part of E. TN with his wife Rebecca Blankenship. And they were producing children rapidly during this period with (we truly believe) Clisbe Austin, Sr.’s being born in early 1802 to ARCH & Rebecca.

Now, there remains the possibility that Clisbe Riggs had an affair with ARCH Austin’s wife in E. TN producing the child Clisbe Austin, Sr.  It really begs the question: “If you just cheated on your wife with another man’s wife (from the same community) producing a bastard child, how would you react if she decided to name that child after you?” Ain’t going to happen!

In 1765, two years before ARCH Austin was born to Wealthy, Edward Riggs already had his son named Clisbe Riggs who was born in NJ. (They probably moved to NC about 1767 or before.) Edward’s wife, and the mother of Clisbe Riggs, was Jane Buckley. Perhaps Wealthy knew Edward, his wife Jane and their son Clisbe while Edward was having his affair with Wealthy. (Seems unlikely, nevertheless. We think Edward was on the move away from his NC home when he met Wealthy in VA.)  Wealthy named her son of 1767 ARCH. Why? We don’t have any idea. Remember, Wealthy never married any man until 1777, 10 years after her affair with Edward (or somebody) producing ARCH. During parts of that 10 years we believe that Wealthy was also having sex with Joseph Austin who was married to Hannah Terry at the same time. Did Wealthy finally tell the truth to her son Archibald Pruett “Austin” producing his desire to settle in E. TN near his real father, Edward Riggs? Did ARCH name his son Clisbe after the older Clisbe Riggs, the ½- uncle of Clisbe Austin, and, as well the ½-brother of ARCH?

Certainly, Wealthy was a woman who likely had sex with “several” men out-of-wedlock. Below we include a Court Record from Pittsylvania VA that indicates Joseph Austin & she were charged with adultery.  "Living in Adultery… Joseph Austin & Wealthy Prewit!"





Don’t we also have some additional proof that Edward Riggs had bastard children in NJ before coming to NC?   According to Alvy…








OTHER NOTES


Concerning the situation with Wealthy & Joseph & Edward in VA:

1.       While unmarried, Wealthy 1st bore a daughter, Frances/Fannie, before 1760 when Wealthy was less than 20 years old. The father of this child was not divulged. Wealthy was charged with bastardy. There may have been other bastard children including a possible son and another daughter. We do not know their names. 1760 court records of Halifax/Pittsylvania Co. (Pittsylvania formed from Halifax in 1767) indicate that a "Wealthy Prewitt" had been taken to court and charged with having a child out of wedlock. Other courts records occurred until 1766 when some charges for Wealthy’s bastardy were dismissed.
2.       Frances/Fanny Pruitt/Austin was listed as daughter of Joseph Austin on Pittsylvania Co, VA June 1813 Court Order Book #16, p 37 and Aug Court 1814, Book 16, P 363. She received $395 from Joseph Austin’s estate when it was finally settled in 1818, some 7+ years after his death. Was she a real daughter of Joseph? Or, was she just entitled to a share of his estate?
3.       Archibald Pruett took the surname “Austin” when he was 10 years old after the 1777 marriage of his mother Wealthy to Joseph Austin. He left VA in 1797 for TN long before Joseph’s death. We suspect that he was not a son of Joseph for the following Y-DNA argument in pt. # 4.
4.       We know from AFAOA Y-DNA studies that Joseph Austin was from a large clan of E1b1a Austin men. A number of these Austin men settled in White Co. TN which is some 170 miles west of Greeneville TN, home to the Austin-Riggs men, Clyde & Robert Austin. There are no E1b1a Austin men in Greene Co. The progenitor of the White Co. E1b1a Austin clan was Nathaniel Austin (b. ~1742) who was the 1st cousin of Joseph Austin. This was proven by John Clinard. First Families of TN Certificates have been granted to a few White Co. TN Austin descendants based on the FFT Ancestor, Nathaniel Austin who entered TN in 1791 – Listed as a "chain carrier" on Claiborne Co. deed, survey conducted 13 Oct 1791.
5.       Frances Pruett/Prewitt married Edmond Covington on 03 Apr 1777, just months before the 26 Nov 1777 marriage of Wealthy to Joseph Austin. Fannie signed her own “consent to marry”. She was ~20 years old at the time. She never lived in the household of Joseph Austin. It appears that Frances/Fannie had a child out-of-wedlock some 5 years earlier, before she married Edmond Covington. She was quite young (~15) at the time. We do not know the father of Fannie’s bastard child. Fannie and Fannie’s child were living with Wealthy and Wealthy’s mother Sarah. Sarah was a widow with husband Daniel’s having died ~1756. The women and Fannie’s brothers William and John farmed the land of the deceased Daniel Prewitt… land willed to Sarah until her death. Son William was killed in the F&I War ~1758. Sarah died ~1785 and the whole farm transferred to son John. Wealthy received a portion of Sarah’s personal estate.
6.       Joseph Austin had 5 sons with his 1st wife Hannah Terry. Hannah died ~1775 when the sons were ages 1-15 years. Joseph cared for these sons by himself until his marriage to Wealthy some 2 years after Hannah’s death. His oldest son John was a Rev. War soldier and did not marry until 1788. His youngest son David married in Pittsylvania Co. in 1797 at age ~22. We mention David because he is the Ancestor of Lloyd Bockstruck, genealogist.
7.       The marriage of Wealthy and Joseph produced four daughters. All four married and bore children. A good bit is known about the descendants of daughters Lucy Austin who married Thomas Kendrick and descendants of Mary Austin who married William Hankins.
8.       Apparently, Edward never encountered Wealthy again after the May 1766 conception event of the two that produced Archibald/ARCH.  The event likely took place near the VA farm of Wealthy & her mother Sarah. That part of today’s Pittsylvania Co. VA is crossed by Hickey’s Rd. which branches off the Great Wagon Road. Wealthy lived a long life, outliving husband Joseph by some 11 years. She outlived Edward Riggs by ~2 years. Edward died in TN; Wealthy, VA. Wealthy never left the boundaries of today’s Pittsylvania Co. VA, we speculate.
9.       There are other Austin lines in upper E TN. For example, in Greene and Washington Co. we find an R-M269 line not related to the Austin-Riggs men. They are compared in the Austin Y-DNA Study table…



Kit 513517 is for Will Austin, now of Knoxville. Though he matches the haplogroup of the Austin-Riggs men of TN & TX, his signature is quite different.  Will descends from John Aston who was born ~1752 in Ireland. AFAOA places John Aston as “Unplaced Southern” and is included at http://www.afaoa.org/db_files/Southern_Unplaced/Individuals/I687.html





Comments